Clinical Trial Finder

Inclusion criteria. 1. Age between 10 and 19 years. 2. Active spondylolysis diagnosed by a participating physician using MRI. Signs of active spondylolysis are defined as edema in the posterior elements of the lumbar vertebrae at the pars interarticularis with or without a fracture. 3. Organized sport participation at least two times per week at the time of diagnosis or onset of LBP. Exclusion criteria. 1. Previous rest from activity > four weeks due to LBP. 2. Numbness or tingling in any lumbar dermatome. 3. Other injury or condition that would alter the plan of care for spondylolysis (i.e., pregnancy, anterior cruci-ate ligament tear in the knee, concussion). 4. History of lumbar spine surgery.

A total of 60 adolescent athletes ages 10-19 with an active spondylolysis will be recruited and enrolled via two study sites. Enrolled athletes will be randomly assigned into either 1) novel IFPP, which will begin rehabilitation immediately upon diagnosis, or 2) control (standard care), which will not begin rehabilitation until lumbar pain resolution. Aim 1: Compare the safety and tolerability of the IFPP with a standard care approach (control) after diagnosis of active spondylolysis. Working hypothesis: Participation in the IFPP will not increase adverse events or delay recovery in adolescents compared to those in the control group who do not exercise during the immediate period following diagnosis of spondylolysis. Aim 2: Assess the effects of the IFPP compared to a standard care approach (control) on improved outcomes among adolescent athletes with an active spondylolysis. Working hypothesis: Athletes randomly assigned in the IFPP will have greater and quicker improvements in outcomes (Function, Pain, Quality of Life, and Edema on MRI) than athletes in the control group. All participants will rest from sport until they meet the return-to-sport criteria. After randomizing, both IFPP and control groups will receive physical therapy (PT) care two times/week until they meet the return-to-sport criteria. Each PT session will last approximately one hour, and both groups will use the same return-to-sport criteria. However, the difference between the IFPP and control group is the time when PT begins. The IFPP group will begin PT immediately upon diagnosis, while the control group will wait until lumbar pain resolves. Interventions in both groups will be standardized across both sites. Return-to-Sport Criteria: The athlete must meet all below criteria to be cleared to return to sport. Athletes will not be told the return-to-sport criteria as this may encourage athletes to under report pain to be cleared sooner. 1. Pain-free repetitive motion to end-range in all cardinal lumbar directions. 2. Completion of two weeks of return-to-sport activity in physical therapy without pain. 3. 0% score on Micheli Functional Scale. Immediate Functional Progression Program Group: Participants in the IFPP group will begin PT immediately (<1 week). The IFPP is a systematic rehabilitation program divided into three phases to allow adolescent athletes with an active spondylolysis to begin exercise immediately without exacerbating symptoms. Progression through the phases is based upon meeting standard function and pain criteria. Control Group: Participants in the control group will wait to start PT until their lumbar pain has resolved. This approach is a common method currently used to treat active spondylolysis. Physicians will assess the resolution of lumbar pain every four weeks at their follow-up visits (four, eight, and 12 weeks). Participants will begin PT (<1week) after the first physician visit where they report no LBP with rest and ADL's. Participants in the control group will follow the same PT treatment program, but progression will be based upon a predetermined timeline as their pain has already resolved (phase I two weeks; phase II two weeks; phase III until passes return-to-sport criteria). Setting: The proposed RCT will be conducted at the Sports Medicine/Physical Therapy Clinics at Nationwide Children's Hospital (NCH) in Columbus, Ohio, and Children's Hospital Colorado (CHCO) in Denver, Colorado. Randomization and Blinding: The REDCap system will block randomize participants into either the IFPP or control group. Block randomization will ensure predetermined ratios of participants in each group (IFPP:Control = 1:1) at each recruitment location (NCH:CHCO = 2:1). This study will be unblinded as it will be impractical to blind treating clinicians or patients to the randomized treatment approach. Aim 1: Compare the safety and tolerability of the IFPP with a standard care approach (control) after diagnosis of active spondylolysis. Working hypothesis: Participation in the IFPP will not increase adverse events or delay recovery in adolescents compared to those in the control group who do not exercise during the immediate period following diagnosis of spondylolysis. 1.a.) Adverse events: For this study, an adverse reaction (mild) will be defined as lumbar symptoms increasing enough to cause 1) an unplanned visit to a physician or 2) a pause in therapy during the episode of care. Previous research has demonstrated that approximately 8% of athletes have a mild adverse event during standard care. No moderate or severe adverse events have been reported to date. 1.a.i.) Monitoring Adverse events: We will track all physician visits within the health system (NCH or CHCO) regarding the LBP episode of care. Any unplanned physician visits due to increased symptoms or formal pausing of rehabilitation by the physician will be documented as an adverse event. Additionally, throughout care and during the follow-up questionnaires, participants will be asked if they have had any medical appointments for the LBP outside of their research study session. If the participant answers, "Yes," study staff will follow up to determine if this meets the criteria for an adverse event. The CRN will act as an independent safety monitoring board to assess all potential adverse events. 1. b.) Data Analysis: For Aim 1, descriptive statistics will assess the frequency of each treatment group's adverse events. Aim 2: Assess the effects of the IFPP compared to a standard care approach (control) on improved outcomes among adolescent athletes with an active spondylolysis. Working hypothesis: Athletes randomly assigned in the IFPP will have greater and quicker improvements in outcomes (Function, Pain, Quality of Life, and Edema on MRI) than athletes in the control group. 2. c.) Data Analysis: An intent-to-treat design with the multiple imputation model will be used for any missing values. Linear mixed-effects models will investigate the effect of rehabilitation timing on pain, function, quality of life, and change in edema. The linear mixed-effects models will provide information about how the patient's sex, type of lesion (stress reaction, unilateral, or bilateral lysis), and treatment location modify treatment effectiveness. Participant baseline characteristics are accounted for by the random intercepts component of the model, while the model's random slope component will account for patients with varying response levels over time. Linear mixed-effects models can give estimates of mean differences in the outcomes between groups at each time point along with an estimate of within and between group correlation that are necessary for sample size calculations for future studies. Time to event analyses will also be conducted. These include Kaplan-Meier curves of the survival probability of being cleared to return to sport for the two groups, while a Log-Rank test will compare the differences in the median time to return to sports between the groups. Additionally, we will use a Cox Proportional Hazards Model to determine the extent to which the IFPP modifies time to return to sport, adjusting for potential covariates, including sex and type of lesion (stress reaction, unilateral, or bilateral lysis). This pilot trial will obtain preliminary effect sizes that will help better estimate the anticipated effect for the full multi-center RCT, as well as to better estimate the required number of patients for future studies.

Arms

Interventions